Thank you for responding to the Tri-Counties Central Labor Council’s 2004 questionnaire.

 

More than 2 million working men and women have a voice on the job through 1,300 AFL-CIO unions in California. Each election year, union members meet in Central Labor and Building Trades Councils to interview candidates and determine which candidates support working families’ issues and merit labor’s endorsement. Your responses to the questions here will be used to make endorsement decisions at the local level, and will be used to demonstrate the difference between candidates in communications to union members.

 

Please be candid, complete and forthright in your responses, and prompt in returning the completed questionnaire. Completed questionnaires should be returned to: TRI-COUNTIES CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL by FRIDAY, JULY 2, 2004.  You may email your responses to: marewol@aol.com or fax to 805-643-9426. If you have any further questions please contact Executive Secretary-Treasurer Marilyn Valenzuela at 805-641-3712.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Name   Bill Winter                                                                  Office Sought:  Mayor of Oxnard

Home Address:  127 South B Street

Home Phone:  805-486-9415

Occupation:  Journalist                                                           Employer:  Self

Work Address:

Work Phone:  805-276-3629

Campaign office address:  333 N. F Street                               Phone: - N/A

Political Consultant:  Alejandro Rivera

Campaign ID Number:  Pending                                              Political Party:  Republican

Which public offices have you held? (Include dates of service)

Please describe your work with union members on any previous positions.

Have you failed to vote in any national, state, legislative general elections or statewide ballot proposition elections in the past five years?   No  Why?

Briefly describe your work background.  Mainly Federal Government Employment

Briefly describe your educational background.   BA in Radio/TV Communications

Are you a union member? No       To which unions have you belonged?

What was your level of participation (steward, officer, member of bargaining team, etc.)?

To what fraternal, professional, civic or social organizations do you belong?

From what other groups are you seeking or have you received endorsements?

Will you seek higher office?       Potential - Yes                                                                                                                                                                                                           

 

CANDIDATE PLEDGE –

SUPPORTING THE RIGHT OF WORKERS TO CHOOSE A UNION

 

Section 923 of California’s Labor Code states it is the public policy of this state that ”It is necessary that the individual workman have full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of his own choosing, to negotiate the terms and conditions of his employment, and that he shall be free from the interference, restraint, or coercion of employers of labor, or their agents, in the designation of such representatives....”

 

Employers have the power to fire, promote, change work assignments and otherwise reward and punish their workers.  There are many responsible employers who respect the rights of their workers and obey the law.  Unfortunately, many employers abuse their power in the workplace to deny their workers the right to freely choose a voice on the job by joining a union and bargaining contracts determining the terms and conditions of their employment.

 

Each year workers seeking to organize a union in their workplace are fired although the law says this is illegal.  After years of litigation, employers are required to rehire these workers and pay back wages minus any income the worker earned after being fired.  Employers pay no other penalty.  Workers receive no compensation for the harm done to their lives and careers.  And unions receive no compensation for the impact of such illegal activities on their organizing drives.

 

Even after workers overcome employer interference and vote for a union many employers then refuse to bargain a contract in good faith.

 

Tri-Counties Central Labor Council asks you as a candidate and elected official to exert moral leadership and to actively support public policies that protect the right of workers to freely choose a voice on the job by participating in a union and to bargaining with their employers.

 

As a candidate and elected official I hereby pledge:

 

1.

To publicly support and actively encourage workers who are organizing a union with all AFL-CIO union based affiliates.

2.

To publicly support and actively encourage the position that workers should be able to freely choose for themselves whether they want to gain a voice on the job by unionizing without the intimidating effects of any employer interference.  This includes publicly supporting and encouraging employers to remain neutral on the question of unionization.

3.

To publicly support and actively encourage the position that no taxpayer money should be spent interfering with the right of workers to freely choose a union.

4.

To publicly support and actively encourage a fair and fast process for determining worker support for unionization including secret ballot election or card check recognition.

5.

To publicly support and actively encourage employers to negotiate an agreement with the union within 90 days after the majority of workers express their choice in favor of forming a union.

6.

To publicly support and actively encourage employers to negotiate good faith collective bargaining agreements with their workers and to abide by the terms of those agreements.

 

 

Signature:_______________________________________________                                Date:_________

 

 

Print Name:________________________________

 

WORKING WITH UNION MEMBERS AND THEIR UNIONS

 

1.         If elected, will you commit to the following actions to support workers engaged in union activity such as bargaining and organizing:

            A.        Walk picket lines?

            B.         Mediate with employers?

            C.         Write letters of support?

            D.        Fight for proper endorsement of current labor law?

            E.         Hold a press conference?

            F.         Speak at rallies?

            YES TO ALL

 

2.         If elected, will you commit to:

A.        Call for and welcome all AFL-CIO affiliates’ input on policy matters that affect the industries that our members work in?

            B.         Attend SEIU, IAFF & OE  leadership and worksite meetings?

            C.         Ensure direct access to you and your staff?

D.        Work to appoint qualified union members to appropriate Boards and Commissions?

            YES TO ALL

 

3.         Briefly explain what actions you have taken as a public official or private citizen that demonstrate your commitment to helping workers achieve a voice on the job and in the political process.

 

While assigned to the US Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Field Office, management was placing unconditional and oppressive work rules on non-management staff.  I contacted the local office of NAGE (National Association of Government Employees).  My union work in contacting and monitoring the votes to gain a union marked me as an employee and negatively impacted my association with this department of the federal government.  I am still seeking resolution to this grievance.

 

 

 

 

PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS

 

Project labor agreements assure labor peace, local employment, and better quality construction in public works projects. PLAs join contractors, subcontractors, builders and developers together with unions to negotiate an agreement for the life of the project. Wage rates, work rules and working conditions are specified under a PLA.  Over the past 60 years, PLA’s have brought projects like the Hoover Dam, the San Diego Water Authority and the San Francisco Airport in on time and on budget, while investing in a skilled, productive California Workforce. 

 

1.  Do you support the concept of project labor agreements? Would you work to ensure that project labor agreements are commonly used for public construction projects in California? Why or why not?

Project labor agreements are an important aspect of the building trades.  I would work with developers to use mainly local union guilds, but realize that many developers may hire from outside the area.  This is an area I would monitor and try to assist the builders with finding ways to afford their projects and gain affiliation with local unions and workforces.

 

2.         Many project labor agreements cover not only the initial construction of the project, but the ongoing maintenance and operation of the completed facility. Such long-term agreements create labor stability for the project long after its construction is completed. Would you actively support such long-term project labor agreements? If not, why not?

 

I see the long-term and on-going agreements, the better manner to obtain union presence on the job site and continued promise of prevailing wage in this city.

 

PUBLIC SAFETY

 

1.                   Describe the ways you would be supportive of public safety during your term of office.

 

Unlike my challenger, I would not support joining the Police and Fire Departments, which was one his pet-projects when he was on the Council.  I would seek more community presence of police, re-implement the bike patrols in downtown, and support sub-stations in the community.  For Fire, I would seek to increase the number of fire stations in the city to 12 stations.

 

PUBLIC SERVICE REVENUES

           

Tax policy, set both legislatively and through the initiative process, continues to have a major negative impact on public services in the state.  A series of initiatives, beginning with Proposition 13 in 1978 and including Proposition 4 (1979), Proposition 62 (1986) and Proposition 218 (1996) have severely restricted the ability of state and local government to raise revenues to improve and expand public services. 

 

Throughout the 1990's state legislators passed and Governors signed billions of dollars worth of tax breaks and loopholes for business, further restricting public revenues.

 

1.         California remains deeply in debt and faces a more than $8 billion structural deficit that future legislators will be forced to confront.  Some people believe that California has a spending problem, and the best way to resolve the budget crisis is to cut spending, reduce regulation, and put severe caps on future growth in government spending.  Other people believe that California needs to invest in quality schools, expanded access to health care, infrastructure, public safety and other essential services and must raise additional revenues to do so in bad economic times.  Which of these two views is closest to your own?

I do not advocate more taxes and fees,  I feel that creating environments where businesses can flourish and spending is unbridled creates more income through taxes, use fees, and general commerce.  As Mayor, I would look to see alternative ways to earn money for the City by more co-operative giving versus involuntary means such as fees, fines, and assessments.  I would look at how the City conducts it’s business, while I admire private contracting, would seek more ways for in-house city workers to do the jobs that some costly contractors are now providing by service for fees.

 

2.         In 2000 voters approved Proposition 39, lowering the voter approval margin for school bonds to 55% from two-thirds.  Do you support or oppose a similar standard to approve local government bond measures, specific targeted local tax increases and parcel tax increases for schools?

No.  I feel 55% is too close and not fairly provide decision makers the basis to act.

 

3.         Commercial property tax rates under Proposition 13 have lagged significantly behind those for private homeowners. Do you support or oppose a change to Proposition 13 to more fairly tax commercial property by reassessing on a regular basis rather than the current change of ownership standard?

 

No.  I believe that attrition and sales of existing Prop 13 properties opens up the funding gap, true it is slower, but more fair to owners who enjoy current Prop 13 benefits.

 

4.         Please describe briefly any actions you have taken as a public official or private citizen that demonstrate your support for your positions on increasing public service revenues.

 

I have submitted suggestions to the Board of Education for means and methods to gain income from non-traditional means that do not depend on standard government funding sources.

 

 

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES

 

The State of California requires that specific standards be met before contracting-out state work, including a showing of actual savings, and requiring a private contractor providing public services to offer its employees wages and benefits comparable to public sector workers.  In 2002 the state standards were applied to school district contracting-out. 

 

1.  Would you support or oppose legislation requiring that these same standards be applied as a minimum for cities, counties and special districts?

 

Highly support, as long as contracting is not for services City employees are capable of providing.

 

Contingent and involuntary part-time workers are increasingly used in the public sector in lieu of filling permanent positions.  These workers are typically denied access to health care and other benefits.   Public services suffer due to the high turnover of workers.

 

2.  Would you support or oppose legislation to restrain state and local government from using contingent workers in lieu of filling permanent positions?

 

I am hopeful that our Congress will initiate a public health care program as health insurance is the top benefit sought by part-time and low-pay service workers.  I would support legislation to curtail contingent and on-call, part time workers with out better benefits and compensation.

 

3.         Please describe any actions you have taken as a public official or private citizen that demonstrate your support for quality public services.

 

As a Neighborhood Chair, I have supported Police, Fire, Parks, Refuse, and Water Departments in handling difficult issues and gaining satisfactory resolution of problems local residents face.

 

 

4.       Please describe any actions you have taken as a public official or private citizen that demonstrate your opposition to contracting out and privatization?

 

I have been vocal on this issue in questionnaires for this election and at endorsement interviews.

 

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & PUBLIC INVESTMENT

Strong, well directed, broadly inclusive economic growth is vital to the health of the California economy.  But in California, as in the rest of the nation, the income gap between rich and poor is continually widening.  Economic development programs must be structured to create access to jobs and a wage structure that does not widen the economic gap.  Public ivestment policy must focus on restoring California’s crumbling, antiquated infrastructure including schools, transportation systems, parks, telecommunications, drinking water systems and public buildings, and on creating new public resources.

 

1.   What priorities would you set for economic development, and how you would seek to ensure that economic strategies benefit workers in a community?  (If you are currently or formerly an elected official, explain how have you worked to ensure that working families benefits from economic development programs in your community.)

 

Our Downtown is currently double-taxed as an extra layer of tax is used to support what is known as a Downtown Business District.  The taxes are given to a secondary private group of select Downtown business owners who are using the monies to re-duplicate City services.  I would seek to sunset this ‘partnership’ and encourage a non-tax-base organization to conduct fund-raising and manage Downtown beautification projects.  As Mayor, I would seek to offer tax benefits to small businesses to come in and revitalize our Downtown, one shop at a time.  I would also partner with the local Channel Islands State University to offering affordable housing and dependable transport from the campus to the Downtown.

Bringing in new small business and new residents would have a positive economic ripple effect to benefit the commercial climate in Oxnard.

 

2.   Would you make an active effort to put clear standards into law ensuring that public funds for economic development and public contracts are directed to responsible companies that pay at least a living wage, provide good benefits to workers, obey all laws and agree to card check neutrality?  If not, why not?

 

This looks good on paper, but Oxnard has a strange way of ignoring standards common to other local governments in the US.  I would have to fight hard, the way business is conducted by the City to ensure clear standards are held to and the Council keeps it’s decisions clear and in the open.

 

3.  Would you support legislation that would increase penalties to companies that participate in the underground economy by failing to pay required overtime, ignoring minimum wage laws, or paying cash under the table?  If not, why not?

I would offer amnesty to companies conducting business in this manner, but again, culturally, this would be difficult to enforce, and even harder to detect.  After amnesty expired, I would cite some larger offenders and seek public funds payment to deter other offenders from continuing like practices.

 

4.  Do you agree that creation of community development strategies must include significant input from labor, community interests and academics?  If not, why not?

 

Yes, our current community development and more specifically, our redevelopment is a closed community of civic leaders who keep outside participation to a minimum.  Again, my work is cut out for me as Mayor.  My primary opponent would conduct business as usual and allow things to remain the same.

 

5.  Do you agree that businesses that violate labor law should be ineligible for state and local public contracts, tax abatements or public subsidies for job creation?  If not, why not?

YES.

 

6.  Do you agree that companies with more than three OSHA health and safety violations, or one willful serious violation should be barred from bidding on public contracts or receiving public dollars until the violations are satisfactorily abated?  If not, why not?

YES, as they are a hazard.

 

7.       Would you support a requirement that government establish a reporting and hearing process for community input on large tax incentive packages for attracting business?  If not, why not?

Yes, I would hope the community would contribute their ideas at quarterly business forums.

 

PRIVATIZATION AND CONTRACTING OUT

 

Some elected officials – operating under the smokescreen of market efficiency – are pursuing ill-conceived efforts to privatize public services.  A growing body of research shows that experienced public-sector workers provide greater efficiency, reliability and quality in essential services.  Privatization or contracting out of public services must never be used as a means to undercut wages and benefits, or undermine union contracts.

 

1.       What is your position on privatization or contracting out of public services?  Under what conditions would you support privatization?

I am against privatization of government services.

 

2.       How would you bring contracted out or privatized services back into public administration?

By first reviewing ALL contracts, surveying services that are needed, and opening up position vacancies to hire new workers with benefits and opportunities to affiliate with the Union.

 

3.       Would you support legislation requiring that privatization be subject to public hearings, to provide full disclosure of cost comparisons, and quality of services.  If not, why not?

No, I feel the City Council, with agreement, can conduct the necessary review, however, the end result of our findings and the processes of our decisions would be open to public scrutiny and comment.

 

4.       Would you support legislation requiring local government, schools and local agencies to adopt contracting provisions similar to those in the Government Code affecting state workers?  These provisions restrict contracting out to those urgent circumstances or special situations where public workers cannot do the work.  If not, why not?

YES, this is exactly what I am seeking.

 

BUILDING SERVICES

 

1.         Would you be willing to encourage building owners, who control the building services economy, to provide livable wages and family health care benefits to the janitors who clean their buildings?

 

I would go further and annotate it as a City Code for janitorial services be specifically covered under living wage rules and conditions.

 

OTHER ISSUES

 

1.         Did you support or oppose the attempt to recall Governor Davis?

 

Recalls are tricky, because they can back fire.  I must admit that I voted for the Recall, but voters did have a host of candidates to choice from the selection process was fair and our Lt Governor was in essence favoring the recall for his own promotion.

 

What public actions did you take to support your position on the recall?

 

I hosted articles and ads on my website:  www.oxnard-journal.com.

 

2.         Did you support or oppose Proposition 54 on the October 7, 2003 ballot?

 

Prop 54 was racially-charged.  I did not vote in support of it.

 

3.         Did you support or oppose Proposition 53 on the October 7, 2003 ballot??

Prop 53 was aimed to improve our infrastructure.  I voted in favor of the measure.

 

4.         To what extent do you believe that employment discrimination continues to deny equal opportunity to minorities and women?

 

I feel that equality is reaching a steady-state in employment and I hope that soon, employment factors will be based on merit instead of heritage.

 

5.         Reliable, accessible, environmentally friendly transportation is a key issue for working families.  What will you do to improve California’s transportation systems?

 

I would seek to improve our bus and trolley system in Oxnard, having smaller open buses and increasing the routes.  At present routes are limited and large buses often ride with small percentages of riders.  On the future side, I would like to see Mono-rails built in Oxnard to provide transport from the State College and Point Mugu to the downtown, the monorail would also be in place in the event of joint-use and commercial use of Point Mugu’s airfield.

 

6.         There is a housing crisis in many areas of the state.  Many working families spend more than half of their income on housing.  What role do you believe the state should play in providing affordable housing?

Affordable Housing can be handled on a state wide basis by opening up remote state and federal lands for small community planning and investment to handle some of the overflow currently experienced in the coastal communities of California.

 

 

 

 

7.         Do you support SB2?

SB2 may drive away businesses from California.  The State needs to provide an option for a tie-in for businesses that cannot afford the coverage minimums, a means to support and use Medi-cal network providers.

 

CANDIDATE INTERESTS

 

1          Briefly describe your top priorities and the policy areas that will be of most interest to you as a  legislator.

 

Address the Housing Explosion in Oxnard, to plan infrastructure to handle new housing already in the pipeline.  Seek innovative methods to solve the burdensome traffic problem in Oxnard.  Create new activity centers, and venues for our youth.  Improve Oxnard’s civic image.

 

2.         What qualifies or distinguishes you from other candidates for this office?

 

I have a heart for the city and for the people of Oxnard.  I’m not afraid getting into the trenches with residents, hearing their concerns, and meeting them face-to-face.   I have been active on the local neighborhood council level and have shown an openness to hear all issues and offer solutions, while being willing to work with and listen to all the residents of this city 

 

3.         Briefly State why you are seeking Labor’s endorsement.

 

Labor’s endorsement is the “touch of Gold” – gold as in the seal of quality, gold for benefits the candidate will reap from association with labor, and gold for the purity of intention which is promised by the candidate to the union to do as said, and hold to what the candidate believes.

I know my candidacy is a long-shot, but I believe I will bring a freshness and a new hope to the people of Oxnard who are really tired of “business as usual”.

I will hold to my promises made this day, when elected, regardless of the outcome of your endorsement, but I do value it and will work to make your endorsement worthy of the decision you make.

 

4.         If Tri-Counties Central Labor Council endorses you, will you carry the endorsement on your materials?

 

I am holding up on my printing in order to place the ‘bug’ on my literature.

 

5.         What actions have you taken as a private citizen or elected official to support workers’ rights or freely join, participate in a union?

My sacrifices within the Federal Government to gain union representation at the Ventura Fish and

Wildlife Service office cost me dearly, but I would willing do it all again and again, and again.

 

6.         Is there anything else you believe is important for the members of SEIU to know about you and your campaign as they evaluate candidates for this office?

 

My intent for Oxnard is to improve our image, our business atmosphere, the quality of life for ALL residents and to make Oxnard the best progressive and most prosperous city in the Tri-Counties area. 

 

Thank you for completing this questionnaire.  Please sign below and return the questionnaire as indicated in the cover letter.

 

 

Signed _______________________________________

 

 

Date___________________

 

 

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: WINTER

To: marewol@aol.com

Cc: oxnardjo@gte.net ; OxnardJournal@gmx.co.uk

Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 8:26 PM

Subject: Tri Counties Meeting - 04 Aug

 

 

To:  Marilyn Valenzuela

      Executive Secretary-Treasurer

      Tri-Counties Central Labor Council

 

 

Marilyn:

 

As discussed earlier last month, I indicated that I would have a potential conflict with attending your monthly meeting and chairing the Neighborhood Council meeting here in Oxnard.

 

After much thought, I feel my primary duties are to the residents and neighborhood representatives and I will have to decline your invitation to address the Labor Council.

 

I would love your endorsement and would hope that the SEIU forwarded a good recommendation, but I face a tough challenger for the seat of Mayor and I feel I can do more for my campaign by being visible performing my duties on the Neighborhood Council Forum.

 

The Questionnaire I completed for the SEIU was comprehensive and my answers should show my dedication to the Unions – I am hopeful you have these responses also.

 

Again, I would highly value your endorsement, and when elected promise to provide you the attention and promises made in my answers to the SEIU questionnaire and the answers provided the SEIU panel that interviewed me in July.

 

You may share this e-mail with the Council.  Thank you for the invitation.  I hope you understand my desire to be serving the people of Oxnard.

 

Best and Kindest Regards,

 

 

Bill Winter

Candidate for Mayor of Oxnard.

www.oxnard-journal.com